There is a theological presumption in assuming that this fire was God's. Or "of God." Or howsoever we might style it. This is always the problem with disasters and it has been our problem from the beginning. It reminds me of the public argument between the Niebuhr brothers (Reinhold and H. Richard) in the 1930s. Or a more recent wrestling by N. T. (Tom) Wright, bishop of Durham, England, on the
place of God in the war on terror. If God is sovereign over all things and God is "all in all" and (most difficultly), God is good then God
is present in all things and it is our most difficult work to discern God's presence and God's will for our time.
The problems that Tom Wright addresses are only tangentially related to this Waukesha fire of December of 2007. It is a kind of conceit to place our small problems of the loss of a 114 year-old building in the same context or breath as Darfur, Gaza, 9-11 or Baghdad. In a certain way, this fire, like the
collapse of the Minneapolis bridge yesterday, is just an accident and we shouldn't try to find any larger theological motifs in it. A good friend of mine who also pastors a church which was consumed by fire, wryly observed that he was glad that the fire officials in finding a cause for the fire didn't call it "an act of God." Fires, collapsing of bridges and the like are not, of course, "acts of God" as insurance companies like to label them.
Still, there is somewhere in all of this, the presence of God, the will of God and, I trust and I know in my very marrow, the goodness of God.
To return to Tom Wright's article cited above, the most important problem for most Christians is the inability of most of us, especially mainstream liberal Christians, to speak of God at all in public. Or even to suggest that God has a role to play in any public event, good or evil. For Wright, Jesus gives us a clue as to the whereabouts of God and the role God plays in public:
It means that whenever we ask the question of where God is in the world – whether in the world in general, or in the Tsunami or the Holocaust or the War on Terror, we should look first for God where the night is darkest and the pain is worst, not in the blaze of glory and the blast of trumpets but in the cry of the baby and the scream of the tortured.
To say that our fire of December is a "fire of God" is only to say that we will understand our current dilemma differently if we somehow understand that it is "of God" in some deeply mysterious way. Our journey thus far--still homeless as we are--has been largely about that process of discovery and hope.